Ivan Toney: Banned Brentford striker diagnosed with gambling addiction

Ivan Toney

Brentford striker Ivan Toney was given a reduced ban from football because of a diagnosed gambling addiction.

Earlier this month Toney was banned for eight months after he accepted breaking Football Association betting rules.

A psychiatry expert who gave evidence to the FA’s regulatory commission diagnosed Toney with a gambling addiction and concluded he needed professional help.

As a result, the commission reduced an 11-month sanction by three months.

In its written reasons explaining its sanction, published on Friday, the commission said Toney had admitted repeatedly lying during his initial interviews with the FA.

It added he had since ceased gambling on football, though not on other sports, and is “determined to address his gambling problem with therapy”.

The FA initially wanted to impose a 15-month ban on Toney because he attempted to conceal his betting, knowing it was against FA rules.

This included betting through third parties and deleting relevant messages from his mobile phone, it said, then knowingly giving “clearly false answers” during his interviews with the FA.

The commission did not uphold all of the FA’s claims.

His ban was reduced to 11 months given he pleaded guilty to all 232 charges before being further reduced to reflect his diagnosed addiction.

Brentford have said they will support Toney with his addiction.

“The club will now be doing everything possible to provide support to Ivan and his family to deal with the issues raised in this case,” they said in a statement.

“We consider this matter closed and look forward to welcoming Ivan back to training in September.”

What were the charges?

Toney admitted to 232 breaches of FA betting rules over a period of five seasons between February 2017 and January 2021.

During this time, he was a registered player at Newcastle and Peterborough as well as spending time on loan at several other clubs.

Of those 232 breaches:

  • 126 bets were in respect of matches in competitions in which Toney’s club at that time participated in.
  • Of those 126, 29 were in respect of the club Toney was playing for at the time.
  • Of those 29, 16 were on his own team to win 15 different matches. Toney played in 11 of those matches.
  • Of those 29, the remaining 13 were on Toney’s team to lose. Toney did not play in any of those matches.
  • Of the 126 bets, 15 were placed on Toney to score. They were initiated at a time when it was not public knowledge that he was starting or playing in the relevant fixtures.

The regulatory commission ruled Toney’s case was not one of match-fixing.

“There is no evidence that Mr Toney did or was even in a position to influence his own team to lose when he placed bets against them winning – he was not in the squad or eligible to play at the time.”

More to follow.

How to follow Brentford on the BBC bannerBrentford banner footer

Adblock test (Why?)

Read Original Article